There are a few important points in this article from cnn.com:
The first important point to be made about this article -- which is the same important point that needs to be made about any article involving George W. Bush -- is that George W. Bush is a complete asshole.
There are two other relevant points in this article. The first involves this quote by Bush: "You do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism." OK, well, let's assume for argument's sake that Bush is correct in this belief. Do you believe it? Good, now let's tear it apart for its utter lack of relevance to the Iraq War. You see, President War-monger, the reason your critics say that the Iraq War is creating terrorists is that we weren't fighting terrorists there, you big dummy -- there were no fuckin' terrorists in Iraq when you invaded it, remember? Almost every single piece of evidence -- most of which had been made available to you but conveniently ignored by you before the invasion -- has made this fact extremely clear. Therefore, if you invaded a country without terrorists (or at the very least without terrorists tied to Osama Bin Lade and Al Qaeda), then technically speaking, you were not fighting terrorism. This being the case, you therfore have no logical basis to assert your belief that we have not created terrorists by going to war with Iraq because you didn't go to war with terrorists in the first place. And, that Mr. Fuckface President, is how one creates terrorists: by lying to Congress and the American people in order to start a war to protect Daddy and Mr. Cheney's oil investments and, in the process, killing thousands upon thousands of innocent Muslims whose families will never forget the sight of their dead relatives' mangled corpses -- and the person who gave the command to make that sight possible -- and thus hold a lifetime of hatred for the country responsible for it all. Yeah, that reminds me, assface: thanks for making some of these people hate me! I didn't do anything to them, including not having voted for your stupid ass. Again, much gratitude, cocksniff. So, do I believe we would we end all terrorist activity by stopping all of our military action and playing nice? Of course not -- even naive liberals know that! So you can stop peddling that myth as well, you piece of toasted shit. No, there is simply no way to stop everybody from becoming a terrorist by playing the game more fairly -- some people are crazy and just want to hate and lash out with that hatred -- but you can minimize the chances of creating terrorists by being respectful of other people's cultures and beliefs and, at the very least, their heartbeats. If you believe otherwise, you probably don't understand any of the teachings of that Jewish carpenter you claim to consult for advice on such matters.
Now, let's get to the second relevant part of the article: those moronic Democrats. Bear in mind that this part of my entry might exist only because of the lazy work of the media; there is a chance that the Democrats did counter Bush's latest act of fear-mongering electioneering with concrete logic(like I just did) instead of the few useless pre-recorded retorts found in the article. That said, the Democratic responses in the article simply aren't enough to effectively counter Bush's latest ludicrous claims about empowering terrorists through the Democratic Party's proposed policies. Here's Nancy Pelosi's response: "It was yet another example of how he is in denial over what is happening in the war on terror." OK, but how, Nancy, how is he in denial? Give us facts and logic! And what about Howard Dean? The Chairman of the Democratic National Committee offered up this same-old song-and-dance: "President Bush's election-year attacks are the product of a desperate White House with no credibility left with the American people." Why does the Bush administration lack credibility, Howard? Most reasonable people know he lacks credibility -- hell, anybody who stopped and looked at the War-monger's resume back in 2000 could tell he didn't have the political credibility of a Wal-Mart cashier -- so tell us why, Howard, please! "How" and "why" are extremely effective, my friends. Granted, they won't work on at least one-half of the general population -- no matter what political party they have registered with -- but those two bits of reasoning might come in handy when trying to persuade at least a quarter of the general public. So use them, you Democratic sissies. Stop being so damn spineless and dish out the common sense with some fucking venom for once.
No comments:
Post a Comment